Tamson Deane

 

Home

Introduction

Burgess
(Dorset)

Hely
(Middlesex)

Burgess
(Cambridgeshire)

Newbury
(Wiltshire)

Taylor
(Stirlingshire)

Dickson
(County Down)

Hilditch
(Staffordshire)

Lawrence
(Middlesex)

Memorabilia
(Documents, photos & more)

Family Trees

Links

Contents and Site Map

Contact

It is not always easy to track someone through the years from a known correct event back to their birth and hence to the names of their parents. If they have an unusual name it can prove very helpful. The story of Tamson Deane is a good example.

The starting point is the marriage certificate for Henry James Burgess and Elizabeth Lucy Hely, which is dated 5 October 1890. As this is the original document passed down through the family, rather than a copy, it has to be correct. Elizabeth’s father was given as James Joseph Hely, confectioner, and the inclusion of his middle name and profession is very fortunate. It leads directly to an entry in the 1891 Census where Elizabeth’s mother was listed as Tomson.

Hely Census 1891
James J Hely
Head
M
57
filler
Confectioner St Giles
Tomson Hely
Wife
M
filler
56
filler
Shoreditch
James H Hely
Son
S
28
filler
Confectioners assistant St Lukes
Helen Hely
Daur
S
filler
23
Card Mounter City
Alice Hely
Daur
S
filler
16
Packer (Biscuit) Bermondsey
Ada Hely
Daur
S
filler
15
Domestic Serv Bermondsey
Emily Flowers
Daur
M
filler
29
Domestic Serv City
Florence Flowers
Grand Dau
filler
filler
9 mo
filler
Shoreditch

Reassuringly, there are several pointers to this being the correct family.

The name James J Hely.
The profession of confectioner.
I remember my father, Harold, having aunts called Alice and Ada.
Harold was a beneficiary in the will when his cousin Floss died - Florence Flowers.

Now the name “Tomson” has appeared and because it is unusual, or even unique, it should stand out during searches. Unfortunately the census enumerators had difficulty spelling her name over the years so it doesn’t always appear as expected.

The 1901 census corrected the spelling to Tamson but should it be something else entirely? After a lot of searching I think I have found all the right references to Tamson.

Census Year
First Name
Surname
Age
1901
Tamson
Hely
67
1891
Tomson
Hely
56
1881
Tandson
Heley
46
1871
Tamzon
Hely
35
1861
Tamson
Hely
23
1851
Tamzone
Deane
17
1841
Thomas
Dean
6

A little explanation is required.

Going back to the 1861 census there were many points of agreement which confirmed this to be the same person from the same family throughout.

James Joseph always gave his full name for a census.
He was consistently in the food trade: barman, confectioner, traveller in confections.
The names and ages of children agreed from census to census.

There are also clues to Tamson’s maiden name.

In 1881 Susannah Deane (aged 71) was included in the household. She was born in Bath, Somerset, a widow, and listed as “mother” in relation to the head of the family. Surely she was "mother-in-law", otherwise she should have been a Hely.

In 1871 Tamson, James J and James H were living at one address while the rest of the family were listed as grandchildren in the household of Elizabeth “Heby”, a widow aged 59. Also there was Susannah Deane, visitor. So it does look as if she was Tamson’s mother.

Armed with her maiden name it didn’t take long to find the reference to Tamson in the 1851 census. Particularly as I had sent for her marriage certificate which indicated that her father was a cabinet maker called John Deane.

Before her marriage she lived with her parents and siblings at 5 Bull Court, Shoreditch, Tower Hamlets. Her mother is shown to be Susan Deane, as suspected.

1841 proved to be a problem. There was no sign of the name Tamson in any of its forms. Only one family came close but with a significant discrepancy. She was a boy!

1841 Census
Age
Occupation
Where born
John Dean
44
Cabinet maker
Not born in Middlesex
Susan
36
filler
Not born in Middlesex
Susan
16
filler
Born in Middlesex
Thomas
6
filler
"
John
4
filler
"
Louise (or Louisa)
1
filler
"

 

1851 Census
Age
Occupation
Where born
John Deane
59
Cabinet maker
Devonport, Devon
Susan
46
filler
Bath, Somerset
Tamzone
17
Shoebinder
Shoreditch, Middx.
John
14
Chair maker (appr.)
Spitalfields, Middx.
Lucy
11
Shoebinder
"
Benjamin
8
filler
"

There are so many points of agreement that I think it must be the same family. John Dean’s age appears wrong but this is not unusual. Look how Tamson aged unevenly after she was married. Louise became Lucy but that is not difficult to explain. Neither is the change from Thomas to Tamzone if you think about the enumerator hearing the name for the first time and trying to interpret it on the census form.
What do you think?

Even if it is not the same household there is still enough information in the 1851 census to try to trace the family further back.

John Deane was born about 1792 in Devonport and his baptism might be recorded in the parish records. If so then it could include his parents’ names.
Susan/Susannah married him, probably before 1825 (when daughter Susan was born). It may be possible to find the record and it could contain Susannah’s maiden name.

Some progress at last! The birth certificate for Lucy/Louise Dean has solved a few problems. First, her name was Lucy Matilda Dean and she was born on 4 Jan 1840 at 11 Butlers Buildings, Great George Street, Middlesex. Her father was John Dean, with no "e", and he was a cabinet maker. Her mother was Susannah Dean, formerly Lee.

I had already found the marriage for this couple. The details are that they were married on 27 April 1825 at St Anne, Soho, Westminster. This fits well with the eldest child being 16 in 1841. Also the location makes sense as Great George Street is just by Westminster Bridge.

Even better, while searching for John Dean's christening in the Devonport records I came across Charles Dean, christened on 28 Apr 1797 at Stoke Damerel, Devon (the old parish name before it became Devonport). The interesting point being that his parents were John and TAMIZON. Is there a connection?

Return to Hely page

 

 

Top of Page